Shipping & Shipbuilding News - 17 April 2007 - The Brightest Maritime Daily

The loss of the anchor handler STEVNS POWER
In 2003 a routine task suddenly became a disaster

Although industry experts who have worked or work in the North Sea have described the BOURBON DOLPHIN tragedy as 'unprecedented', this can only really apply to the North Sea. It isn't the first time an Anchor Handling Tug (AHT) vessel has sank during routine anchor handling operations in this manner.

On 19th October 2003 a Danish AHT, the STEVNS POWER, sank whilst operating off the Nigerian Coast. She was at the time moving an anchor, one of 12, that was holding the position of the CASTORO OTTO, a pipe laying vessel.

Unlike the BOURBON DOLPHIN she was not a new vessel, being built in 1976, but the procedure was one she and her crew were largely familiar with and had been doing so regularly for at least two years with the CASTORO OTTO.

It is the job of an anchor handler to re-position the anchors that keep a rig or other sea platform in their desired position. The CASTORO OTTO was laying a gas pipe and needed to relocate her anchors. Late that afternoon STEVNS POWER began operations to relocate anchor No.10. She lifted the anchor off the sea bed and indicated she had done so and CASTORO OTTO's winch then began pulling the anchor wire with STEVNS POWER manoeuvring astern as this was done.

The tug then executed a turn, necessary to keep the anchor cable following a straight line to the new position for the anchor, when suddenly she heeled over. It appeared that her stern plunged below the surface of the sea and within a minute the vessel was so overpowered by the ingress of water she capsized, leaving just her bow sticking out of the water.

None of her 11 crew survived the tragedy.

A subsequent inquiry concluded that factors which had contributed to the loss of the vessel and her crew included:

Lack of proper safety procedures between the pipe laying vessel and STEVNS POWER
The practice of having very little freeboard aft to allow easier lifting of the anchor buoy
The turning manoeuvre and the speed at which the anchor line was pulled in from the client ship.
The tug was going astern too fast.
Open hatches and perhaps open watertight doors (the heat in the region probably meant crew left doors open instead of closing them as is normal practice during anchor handling)

There were other factors that could have contributed, but the inquiry did not have sufficient evidence to establish if they did: these included the anchor wires snagging, failure of steering gear (the STEVNS POWER had had problems with this before the incident), lack of experience on part of the navigator at the helm at the time or fatigue on his part.

The report also concluded with a warning to crews not to wish for speedier, but safer operations. A few minutes saving was not worth the risks involved.

The tragedy focussed minds on how potentially dangerous anchor handling is. Here were experienced hands on a vessel that had performed such tasks over and over again, often many times in a day, and in the relatively calm waters off the African coast.

Every day in our waters these vessels, with the expertise of their masters and crew, bravely carry out their duties in seas that can be hostile indeed. The general public never give such matters a second thought, nor do many shipping buffs for that matter, and whether or no the BOURBON DOLPHIN tragedy proves to have any similarities with the one in 2003, we must always remember that it can take just one minute for any operation to change from routine to disaster.


Click here for front page of the Shipping Times

About Us - Click here for contacts, enquiries, addresses
Editorial contact:
Shipping Times UK, Fullarton House, Ayr, UK KA7 1UB
Copyright 2007 Shipping Times UK - Reproduction prohibited without permission